Le rapport de l’ONU sur l’immigration de remplacement montre que le sujet n’a rien n’un fantasme d’extrême droite. Extraits :
« Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?
United Nations projections indicate that over the next 50 years, the populations of virtually all countries of Europe as well as Japan will face population decline and population ageing. The new challenges of declining and ageing populations will require comprehensive reassessments of many established policies and programmes, including those relating to international migration.
Focusing on these two striking and critical population trends, the report considers replacement migration for eight low-fertility countries (France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, United Kingdom and United States) and two regions (Europe and the European Union). Replacement migration refers to the international migration that a country would need to offset population decline and population ageing resulting from low fertility and mortality rates. »
Dans les conclusions ce n’est pas l’option de soutien public à la natalité qui est préconisée mais le recourt aux étrangers :
« (…)increasing the size of the working-age population through international migration is the only option in the short to medium term to reduce the declines in the potential support ratio.The present study considers countries in which current fertility ranges from 1.2 to 2.0 children per woman. For France, the United Kingdom, the United States and the European Union, the number of migrants needed to offset population decline is less than or comparable to recent past experience. »
